CL
Unclaimed author profile

Claes Fornell

· University of Michigan

Is this your research profile?

Create or sign in to your KnowledgeTrend account to claim this page. After the claim, this same profile URL and its linked publications will belong to your account. Claiming does not automatically grant a verified badge.

Create account and claim this profile Sign in to claim
4Linked publications
0Citations
0h-index
0i10-index

Metrics are calculated from publications currently linked to this profile.

Researcher overview

About

Claes Fornell is a registered researcher in their academic field.

Research output

Recent Publications

4 research works linked to this profile

▤
Advanced Statistical Methods and Models, Multi-Criteria Decision Making, Statistical Methods and Applications · 1981 · Journal of Marketing Research

Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error: Algebra and Statistics

Several issues relating to goodness of fit in structural equations are examined. The convergence and differentiation criteria, as applied by Bagozzi, are shown not to stand up under mathematical or statistical analysis. The authors argue that the choice of interpretative statistic must be based on the research objective. They demonstrate that when this is done the Fornell-Larcker testing system is internally consistent and that it conforms to the rules of correspondence for relating data to abstract variables.

ViewFull file not uploaded
▤
Psychometric Methodologies and Testing, Multi-Criteria Decision Making, Advanced Statistical Methods and Models · 1981 · Journal of Marketing Research

Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error

The statistical tests used in the analysis of structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error are examined. A drawback of the commonly applied chi square test, in addition to the known problems related to sample size and power, is that it may indicate an increasing correspondence between the hypothesized model and the observed data as both the measurement properties and the relationship between constructs decline. Further, and contrary to common assertion, the risk of making a Type II error can be substantial even when the sample size is large. Moreover, the present testing methods are unable to assess a model's explanatory power. To overcome these problems, the authors develop and apply a testing system based on measures of shared variance within the structural model, measurement model, and overall model.

ViewFull file not uploaded